3 - General and
Special Revelation - Special Revelation
Now that we have looked at General
Revelation, let’s look at special revelation.
I think the best place to begin is to look at
John 1:1. “In the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” Later in this chapter we see that the “Word”
is a reference to Jesus. The Greek word
used here is “logos,” generally meaning “a discourse.” It is a revelation/discourse referencing what
“is.” It is what is divinely mentioned –
coming directly from God to us to reveal what “is” about God and His
character. Within this logos is the
gospel message – the story about redemption and salvation as a matter of the
Grace of God.
This reference does not mean that special revelation
is more “special” than general revelation, but that the two, used in unity,
reveal God, though in different ways.
An easy way to look at it is that special
revelation is the Bible, but that is not exactly complete. For instance, in Genesis – and this was prior
to the fall – God tells Adam and Eve to be fruitful and multiply, among other
things. Prior to the fall and prior to
the written Word, God spoke directly to man.
He did so throughout a good part of the Old Testament. In addition, God commissioned prophets, later
in the Old Testament, and used them to speak to His people. This too is a part of God’s special
revelation.
In the Old and New Testaments, special
revelation can be seen as coming through the use of the “lot”. We wouldn’t or shouldn’t use that method
today, mostly because we have the Bible,
but nonetheless it was a way that God used to communicate to man. Was it used in a redemptive way? I tend to think not, but there are others who
would disagree. Similarly, the urim and
the thummin were used in the Old Testament by the high priest. In the Old Testament, God communicated by
dreams and visions. Prior to the
incarnation, angels of the Lord appeared to carry God’s message to man. The same took place in the book of Revelation
in the New Testament. The pre-incarnate
Christ appeared to Daniel delivering a divine message. Certain acts of God throughout history can be
seen as some sort of revelation from God.
Many of the forgoing examples, I remember from reading Basic Theology, by Charles Ryrie, who I
admire greatly. He states that
revelation need not be found exclusively in the Bible, but in the acts of God and in a subjective encounter with
God. Some of that may be hard to
measure, but who am I to disagree with Ryrie?
He also stated that there must be many sayings spoken by Jesus that are
not recorded in the Bible that would
certainly be God’s special revelation. I
wholeheartedly believe that.
There is a question today, whether or not one
who is called to proclaim the Gospel, whether from the pulpit or otherwise, and
who truly listens to and hears from God, is delivering God’s special
revelation. Though, I believe strongly
in my friend and pastor, Bill Oudemolen, I also believe that the canons of
Scripture and prophecy – as a gift – has ceased, so I would not necessarily regard
Pastor Bill’s sermons as rising to the level of special revelation. He is great and he reveals God’s truth, often
with a distinctive Gospel message. He is
called, he proclaims the Gospel and he is dynamic. I believe that he speaks with authority, the
Word of God. I do not believe that God
speaks to him in the same way as He spoke to the prophets. I’m still wrestling with this concept. Some would be upset at me for saying this,
but I know Pastor Bill well enough to be able to say it. I’ve never asked him, but I suspect he would
agree with me on this subject. On the
other hand, I doubt that any of the prophets had a head of hair as cool as Bill’s
head of hair, but that’s another story.
Finally, some believe that certain of the
“sign” gifts are evidence of special revelation. I have no doubt that if God wants to give a
special message to and through someone, He can and will do that, but I do not
personally believe that the miraculous sign gifts are alive today as spiritual
gifts. I believe that these “signs and wonders”
ceased at the end of the apostolic age.
They were needed then, but not now.
I have charismatic friends who would disagree with that, but it is my
opinion and one that is shared by most of the conservative, Christian
community. I do know that this belief or
non-belief has divided the Christian community in a number of areas, special
revelation, being one of them. What I
know is this: If someone claims to prophesy
and is wrong, s/he is a false prophet.
If one claims to prophesy or claims to have “a Word” of knowledge or
truth that is contrary to the canons of Scripture or the character of God, that
person is a false prophet. So whatever you decide in this area, make sure you
use the right standard by which to test.
Don’t lightly take someone at his word that he is a prophet of God or
has a word of knowledge or truth from God.
On the other hand, it is not good to shy away
from the concept of special knowledge merely because you do not agree with this
portion of a Christian denomination or sect.
Special knowledge is true and He is faithful. Just use the right measuring stick.
So, I hope this mini-lesson in revelation has
been helpful. I had fun thinking it
through.
Who knows what I’ll do next. I suspect I will take a break as I visit my
brother in Tucson through April 18. He
is oh so much older than I am. He turns
a massive 65 four days after I become a young 63. I may check in a few times, but right now, I
really need a break.
Thanks for checking in.
Doug